Skip to main content

Religion is not necessarily idiotic

Pope Francis


Pope Francis has declared that the Big Bang theory and his religion are not in conflict with each other.  The Bible is fiction. 

The Bible is scripture.  It is not meant to teach science.  As Galileo put it beautifully, “The Bible teaches how to go to heaven, science teaches how the heavens go.”

Even the religious fundamentalists are interested in how the heavens go rather than how to go to heaven.  Even they know that there is no heaven.  

All that religions have been doing so far is to manipulate.  So that they have power.  Power.  No exceptions. 

Exceptions became extinct.  Or evolved.  And gained power.  Or are begging/fighting for power.  

When power rules, humanity dies.  Because power belongs to the animals. ‘ Might is right’ is the law of the jungle.

Religion originated as a quest.  A search for the beyond.  What could not be understood was labelled as god or demon. 

Do we need that sort of search anymore?  Don’t we have a better tool in science?

Science has its drawbacks and limitations.  Yet isn’t it the best tool that we today have?

Can’t we keep our scriptures and epics in our libraries and become human?

Religion need not be necessarily idiotic.  I love Pope Francis for saying that.  Of course, I have paraphrased him.  He will forgive me, I know.  He is not an idiot.


Top post on IndiBlogger.in, the community of Indian Bloggers




Comments

  1. Yet we may need religion ... In small doses .......... a soft one without hatred ....... as tranquilizer …….

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, DMR. That's why I've posted this.

      And thanks for being here after a long time.

      Delete
    2. "Religion originated as a quest. A search for the beyond. What could not be understood was labelled as god or demon. " I agree with you sir. But if we realize that God is nothing more than that,do we still need religion.Will there be really a chaos without God or religion? I too sometimes feel the need of a superpower who denotes goodness and with whom I can talk to,but I don't believe that there is such a power. Even if I start believing in him it will be after transcending all the religions. Do you think that religion is necessary to get to know about God?

      Delete
    3. The search for knowledge and truth has been the human endeavour from time immemorial.Conciousness evolves through honest intellectual search.One's life is the quest for discovery of consciousness evolving into deeper knowlege and understanding this is truth.

      Delete
    4. Amitach, religion has been more a hindrance than a support in the path towards truth. It blinds the believer with given truths. The search for spiritual truths is a highly personal one. Religion can help provided the seeker knows how to use it instead of being used by it. Most of the time people are not seeking any truth; they are seeking community - hence communalism.

      Delete
    5. Babychetta, it is the honest intellectual pursuit that I'm defending. Has the Church ever defended it? Hasn't it actually prevented any such search? Hans Kung, the theologian himself, said in an interview to Frontline a few years ago how many theologians were persecuted by the Church because they wanted it to be more truthful... I think we should welcome and support the Pope's initiative to make the Church relevant to the contemporary world.

      Delete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A lot of what religion is perceived to be depends on its interpretation.
    Usually when it comes across as 'idiotic', it is the idiots construing it who should be blamed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Religion has been highly regressive, Nimi. It always pulls back to the past. It refuses to accept the new and the different. The theory of evolution was questioned all the time by the Christians and heir churches. So the present statement by the Pope is a revolution in the Church.

      Delete
  4. I don't understand why science and religion can't co-exist!!! Why one has to oppose the other? Science aims at world-development while religion is for moral development. Though excess of both can ruin the things! isn't it? Religion happened to encourage people towards good Karmas, to define better ways to live, which later on was misused by authorities for their selfish interests. While christanity has been quite orthodox about science, many scientific theories and ideas are presented in our ancient Hindu texts (Vedas). I believe in both soul and cell, evolution and God, probably that suits me best!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your last sentence says it all. Ultimately, religion is a mere personal need and nothing more. For any spiritual quest or moral development, religion is not required at all. In fact, religion distorts one's spirituality and morality. Look at the number of crimes, riots, wars, and so on perpetrated in the name of religion. Religion has been, perhaps, the biggest cause of pain among men.

      Delete
  5. I can't agree .... that "the Holy Bible is fiction"
    I am greatly worried...
    Because the Holy Bible says ... all these things and things greater than these are bound to happen..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pope Francis was not the first to say this. Many Biblical scholars said long ago that the first 11 chapters of the Bible are mere myth not to be taken literally.

      And don't ever delude yourself that what the Bible says will surely happen. Poetry and fiction can be interpreted differently.

      Delete
  6. I agree . with you and Galileo :) It sums up all :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True, Kokila, two different purposes and they don't necessarily meet.

      Delete
  7. Good post.. Religion came into being to teach civilizations a way of life.. It was meant to explain the laws of nature (in short science :)) to common man in layman terms.. Now it has diminished to just rules and controversies.. Like any entity it has got adulterated with time.. Now there is need to undo all the evolved religious beliefs that has divided the mankind in various sects and write a new, fresh scripture that can connect all.. once again..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A new, fresh scripture ... or at least interpret the existing one meaningfully. I think the Pope wants to do that. But his cardinals won't let him go too far, I assure you. The Church is a very powerful organisation rooted in obscurantism.

      Delete
  8. It is not at all about carefulness, Ashwini, it is all about enlightening people. I am fabulously delighted that a man of no lesser stature than the Pope has come out to state that his religion was able to accept science. It is a great beginning.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pranita a perverted genius

Bulldozer begins its work at Sawan Pranita was a perverted genius. She had Machiavelli’s brain, Octavian’s relentlessness, and Levin’s intellectual calibre. She could have worked wonders if she wanted. She could have created a beautiful world around her. She had the potential. Yet she chose to be a ruthless exterminator. She came to Sawan Public School just to kill it. A religious cult called Radha Soami Satsang Beas [RSSB] had taken over the school from its owner who had never visited the school for over 20 years. This owner, a prominent entrepreneur with a gargantuan ego, had come to the conclusion that the morality of the school’s staff was deviating from the wavelengths determined by him. Moreover, his one foot was inching towards the grave. I was also told that there were some domestic noises which were grating against his patriarchal sensibilities. One holy solution for all these was to hand over the school and its enormous campus (nearly 20 acres of land on the outskirts

Queen of Religion

She looked like Queen Victoria in the latter’s youth but with a snow-white head. She was slim, fair and graceful. She always smiled but the smile had no life. Someone on the campus described it as a “plastic smile.” She was charming by physical appearance. Soon all of us on the Sawan school campus would realise how deceptive appearances were. Queen took over the administration of Sawan school on behalf of her religious cult RSSB [Radha Soami Satsang Beas]. A lot was said about RSSB in the previous post. Its godman Gurinder Singh Dhillon is now 70 years old. I don’t know whether age has mellowed his lust for land and wealth. Even at the age of 64, he was embroiled in a financial scam that led to the fall of two colossal business enterprises, Fortis Healthcare and Religare finance. That was just a couple of years after he had succeeded in making Sawan school vanish without a trace from Delhi which he did for the sake of adding the school’s twenty-odd acres of land to his existing hun

Machiavelli the Reverend

Let us go today , you and I, through certain miasmic streets. Nothing will be quite clear along our way because this journey is through some delusions and illusions. You will meet people wearing holy robes and talking about morality and virtues. Some of them will claim to be god’s men and some will make taller claims. Some of them are just amorphous. Invisible. But omnipotent. You can feel their power around you. On you. Oppressing you. Stifling you. Reverend Machiavelli is one such oppressive power. You will meet Franz Kafka somewhere along the way. Joseph K’s ghost will pass by. Remember Joseph K who was arrested one fine morning for a crime that nobody knew anything about? Neither Joseph nor the men who arrest him know why Joseph K is arrested. The power that keeps Joseph K under arrest is invisible. He cannot get answers to his valid questions from the visible agents of that power. He cannot explain himself to that power. Finally, he is taken to a quarry outside the town wher

Nakulan the Outcast

Nakulan was one of the many tenants of Hevendrea . A professor in the botany department of the North Eastern Hill University, he was a very lovable person. Some sense of inferiority complex that came from his caste status made him scoff the very idea of his lovability. He lived with his wife and three children in one of Heavendrea’s many cottages. When he wanted to have a drink, he would walk over to my hut. We sipped our whiskies and discussed Shillong’s intriguing politics or something of the sort while my cassette player crooned gently in the background. Nakulan was more than ten years my senior by age. He taught a subject which had never aroused my interest at any stage of my life. It made no difference to me whether a leaf was pinnately compound or palmately compound. You don’t need to know about anther and stigma in order to understand a flower. My friend Levin would have ascribed my lack of interest in Nakulan’s subject to my egomania. I always thought that Nakulan lived

Octavian the Guru

Octavian was one of my students in college. Being a student of English literature, he had reasons to establish a personal rapport with me. It took me months to realise that the rapport was fake. He was playing a role for the sake of Rev Machiavelli . Octavian was about 20 years old and I was nearly double his age. Yet he could deceive me too easily. The plain truth is that anyone can deceive me as easily even today. I haven’t learnt certain basic lessons of life. Sheer inability. Some people are like that. Levin would say that my egomania and the concomitant hubris prevented my learning of the essential lessons of life. That would have been true in those days when Octavian took me for a farcical ride. By the time that ride was over, I had learnt at least one thing: that my ego was pulped. More than 20 years have passed after that and I haven’t still learnt to manage affairs in the world of people. That’s why I admit my sheer inability to learn some fundamental lessons of life. Th